Tea, Economics, Paint — and thoughts on existence

I’ve got a cup of green tea, three open windows (it is a beautiful 50° F), and a pile of homework due shortly. I’m [supposed to be] working on two multi-part (multi-part meaning over a dozen sub-questions each) economics questions due Monday and my first art project due Tuesday.

After reading about mathematically described recursive data structures all day, I’m taking a little break to write. So, here we are. You, me, and some extemporaneous thoughts to follow:

Well, the holidays are quickly approaching… and that means expectations are in place for everyone to mingle with family and friends. Which gets me wondering if that is a worthwhile use of time. More generally I start to wonder how much time people should really be spending outside of solitude. Refrain from deeply gasping, it will interfere with your attention.

I’ve known a few hundred people, and have had some type of observational opportunity for thousands of others. What I always enjoy discovering, usually directly, is who people are. Specifically, what they want, where they want to be, how they intend on getting there, what’s driving them towards tomorrow, and what other common thought they entertain frequently. Very rarely do I meet someone who can answer those questions.

I know many college graduates that never put their degrees to use. They took on thousands of dollars of debt, only to work in unskilled jobs. So many people detest their employment.

Another common question I like to ask: is the person happy. So often I have seen people flee from the answer, and many times tears accompanied my prying investigation.

Everywhere people enjoy drugs, alcohol, sex, food in excess, etc.

My meandering thoughts are trying to get at a few simple ideas. In my experience, most people do not know what they want or who they are, and happiness is often dependent on things external.

These issues are insurmountably problematic for me, because they seem to warrant the severest form of personal attention, but are so often masked or neglected.

If someone’s happiness has external dependencies, it must be unstable. Revocable, destructible, temporary. A happiness like that would seem destined to cause unhappiness at some point. Assuming happiness is the ideal state, it seems like a person should devote plenty of time to cultivating a stable source of happiness. An internal source. And to do that, it seems like one would need to minimize the external. Spend time alone, with internally spawned ideas, looking for a happiness that can exist when nothing else is there.

Spend enough time alone, and one is bound to uncover things about one’s self. Which eliminates wasted time – trying to find yourself using someone Else’s directions is ridiculous. And once you’re fully aware of who you are, you’re much better equipped to enjoy others.

I’m running out of time to flesh out these thoughts in more detail, but I’m going to revisit these ideas soon.

For now: if you have issues with unstable happiness or an uncertain self, consider spending the holidays alone. The last thing you need is distraction from fixing problems that could potentially linger for life.

6,631,136,127… my net worth

Ha! A few years left!

Seriously, that number represents the number of people in the world a few seconds ago. I find it humbling to watch the world population (albeit it only a rough estimate) – it keeps going up. I was born over one billion births ago. I am a small man on a large planet, in an expansive unknown; for all practical purposes – I might as well not exist.

Setting chaos theory aside for a moment – my life will never really accomplish anything. In the grand scheme of everything – I will live… and I will die… and the universe shall not abate. It has no reason to notice my existence – it will have no reason to notice my death.

(more…)

A note about kindness…

There are plenty of people out there who could tell you that the kindness of others is something to bask in. Why catch the tab if your friends is glad to do it for you, why work if the government will give you food and cash, why do anything when there are those that will come to your rescue? I am not one of those people, but they are out there.

There are others that will tell you kindness can contribute to laziness. That generosity is not always as it seems. That if you don’t work for it yourself, its not worth having. I sometimes think this way.
In both situations you have your gift-givers. The generous, sometimes more fortunate, people that make kindness “happen” – if you will. They love smiles, opening doors, and introducing hope. I have run across a few of these givers. I have been the giver a time or two myself.

Now you ask (or I ask) – how, at one time or another being a giver can I be so reluctant to take? I’m not sure myself. Something about kindness is unsettling. It feel almost unnatural, wrong even, disturbing sometimes. When does your ability to take undermine your ability to work – or, even more importantly – to appreciate the fruits of work? At what point does your acceptance of a gift transform into your actual “ownership” over the gift. Can it ever be yours?

I’m asking today… because I am trying to sort this whole thing out in my mind. The universitys to which I applied have offered my thousands of dollars – I do not feel bad to accept their offer based on my impersonal “need” or “stats”. A dear friend hands me an envelope of cash with a personal note – I feel hesitant to accept. What is this? Why isn’t the converse true? Should it be? Is one feeling more accurate than another?

In due time I hope to change the world in which I find myself now. I hope to make it a better place. No doubt kindness will be integrated into my plan of reformation. How would I respond if my kindness went unaccepted or shunned? How would I define eligibility for those wanting to receive it?

In the end – there seems no correct answer. It appears a matter of personal ideals and pros and cons of a situation. Yet to write them down side by side and make a through decisions – seems to defeat the purpose of random generosity – or any kindness – all together. Doesn’t it? For these acts are fairly illogical themselves…